Newsletter Signup
Stay informed with the
NEW Casino City Times newsletter! Recent Articles
Best of John Robison
|
Gaming Guru
Ask the Slot Expert: Are Class II slot machines random?18 December 2019
Answer: You have it exactly right. The pattern filled on the bingo card determines what you win on a spin. You're not right, however, that the results on the machines are not random. They are random, just not determined in the same way as on a Class III machine. Rather than each machine having an internal RNG and determining its results on its own and independently of any other machine, Class II machines are actually bingo drawings under the hood. You're really playing bingo. The spinning reels and playing cards are just window dressing to reveal the amount you won according to the pattern you covered on your bingo card. The results are still determined at random. Rather than random numbers from Random Number Generator function, Class II machines use randomly drawn bingo numbers. It's interesting to note that the winning patterns are not necessarily the usual patters you're striving for in a live bingo game. (I have to admit that I have newfound respect for bingo players after playing in a complimentary session a few months ago. Some of the patterns are complicated and it can be difficult to see if you've covered a pattern when one set of cards is used for multiple patterns.) A winning pattern might be two squares in the second row. You can see some videos in which people go through the help screens on Class II slot machines on YouTube.
Answer: I'm curious too. The only time I've heard of a casino refusing to pay a legitimate jackpot was when the player was underage. This incident raises a question: What if the players card belonged to some random person who forgot it? Would the casino then want to pay that person? And another question: If there was a W-2G, in whose name was it issued? And another: What if your friend's wife wasn't with him? In cases where people have pooled money or someone has given another person money to play with or let someone play their credits on a machine, the casinos pay the person playing the machine. Their reasoning is that they don't have any idea what financial arrangements might be in effect, but they can review the surveillance footage and see who pressed the Spin button. The player gets paid. Different casinos have different rules for playing on other people's cards, but I think Pay the Player is universal. Either they didn't understand the proper procedure in this situation or, more likely, they just wanted to passive-aggressively suggest that your friend not play on his wife's card again without saying so explicitly. Has anyone else had problems getting paid when they've played on another player's card?
Answer: Congratulations on the two royals. Good point about scratcher-based machines vis-a-vis RNG-based machines. For the casino, there is no volatility on the scratchers. Sure, the casino's actual hold percentage can be all over the place as a prize pool is exhausted. But at the completion of the prize pool, the hold percentage is exactly what the prize pool was designed to hold. On RNG-based machines, it can take millions of hands for the actual hold percentage on a particular video poker paytable to settle in near the theoretical. For the player, the long-term payback of video poker is determined by the paytable on an RNG-based machine and the odds of getting any particular hand never changes. On scratcher-based video poker, the long-term payback is determined by what's in the prize pool, so the paytable is irrelevant. Furthermore, the odds of winning change with what's left in the prize pool. And, most importantly, because your result is determined by what you've drawn from the prize pool, strategy is also irrelevant. Send your slot and video poker questions to John Robison, Slot Expert™, at slotexpert@slotexpert.com. Because of the volume of mail I receive, I regret that I can't reply to every question.
Recent Articles
Best of John Robison
John Robison |
John Robison |