 Newsletter Signup
Stay informed with the
NEW Casino City Times newsletter! I. Nelson Rose Archives
More Strategy Experts
|
I. Nelson Rose Gaming Guru  Judge rules taking bets from black markets is no big deal22 May 2023
By I. Nelson Rose An online sportsbook can report taking millions of dollars in bets from gray and black markets, as long as the numbers they report are accurate. This is the startling decision of New York federal district court judge Paul A. Engelmayer: “disclosing the fact of operations in Asia ‘did nothing more than’ accurately ‘characterize statistical facts.’” I have taught International Gaming Law as a Visiting Professor at the University of Macau almost every summer since 2007, and often act as a consultant and expert witness for governments and industry. But you don’t have to be a Law Professor to know that gambling, especially internet sports betting, is illegal in almost every jurisdiction in Asia. Judge Engelmayer ruled that that doesn’t matter. A company reporting hundreds of millions of dollars in wagers from “Asia,” “did not oblige it to address different subjects: the particular jurisdictions in which that revenue was earned, or the allocation of that revenue to non-black-market, versus black-market, jurisdictions.” To be clear, black market means it was illegal, which means it was a crime under the local law. But, again, Judge Engelmayer: “No actionable omission where financial reporting was accurate, even where it did not disclose revenue sources relating to uncharged criminal conduct.” The case was an attempted class action against DraftKings, involving its acquisition of a company, SBTech (Global) Limited, which DraftKings acquired in the course of going public. The Complaint, dismissed by Judge Engelmayer, alleged that SBTech “had secretly operated in ‘black-market’ jurisdictions — that is, ones in which gambling was illegal.” DraftKings, SBTech and every other defendant have denied all of the allegations. The decision raises an interesting question of whether there is actually this great a difference between securities laws and gambling laws. No regulator or judge would dismiss allegations of criminal gambling operations like these if a company were seeking a gambling license. At the very least, a licensed sports book would have to explain where it took online bets and whether those bets were legal. It couldn’t just say, “Asia.” Judge Engelmayer based his decision not on gambling law, but rather on securities laws. The suit alleged that the defendants had committed securities fraud. Judge Engelmayer ruled that the Complaint did not adequately spell out the alleged fraud. But he then went further: The defendants had been under no obligation “to identify its alleged operations in black-market jurisdictions.” He ruled that under securities law, there is “no duty to disclose” such information “merely because a reasonable investor would very much like to know” such information. It is, of course, possible that Judge Engelmayer was wrong. I am not an expert on securities laws. But I also worry about one of his other decisions. Securities fraud requires “scienter,” basically meaning the defendants had bad motives. This “can be established with allegations that a defendant made unusual insider sales at a time when he withheld material information from the investing public.” Here, one of the defendants sold $601 million in stock. Or maybe I should say “only” $601 million. Because Judge Engelmayer ruled that that insider’s profits did not sufficiently allege scienter, because the defendant could have sold even more! And anyway, the numbers were accurate.
Judge rules taking bets from black markets is no big deal
is republished from Online.CasinoCity.com.
NFL suspends five players for alleged violations of gambling policy25 April 2023
The NFL hit four Detroit Lions and one Washington Commander with heavy suspensions for allegedly violating league gambling policy, officials said Friday. Wide receiver Quintez Cephus and safety C.J. Moore of the Lions, and defensive end Shaka Toney of the Commanders were “suspended indefinitely through at ... (read more)
What's next for California sports betting?17 November 2022
Some of the richest, most powerful political players in the world of legal gambling just spent the most money ever on ballot propositions, nearly half a billion dollars, and won… nothing. Well, not exactly nothing. It’s important to not only see what proponents of a measure want, but also what happens if they lose. ... (read more)
California tribes would get sports betting if they didn’t hate card clubs25 August 2022
The extremely rich and politically powerful gaming tribes in California are spending nearly half a billion dollars this year to win the right to have sports betting. Or, I should say, they are throwing away their money on a fatally flawed initiative, which the voters will reject in November. And it is the tribes’ own fault. ... (read more)
What should daily fantasy sports do now?The two big daily fantasy sports (DFS) operators, FanDuel and DraftKings, and their backers are, in the immortal words of former President George H.W. Bush, in "deep-doodoo." But lawyers with legal shovels can probably dig them out.Gambling and the Law: Are daily fantasy sports legal?Technology is speeding up changes in the world of gaming. It took almost two centuries for poker to evolve from Straight Poker – five paper cards dealt face down with no draw – to Internet Hold ‘Em linking players using computers in different states and even on different continents. Decades passed before ... (read more)Gambling and the Law: Culture clashIt is not easy to do business in Asia. Or in the U.S.This is especially true of heavily regulated businesses, like legal gaming. And the problems are compounded when an individual who is a product of one culture wants to expand into a foreign market.Sometimes, the barriers are structural. How, for example, ... (read more)Gambling and the Law: Be Afraid! Be Very Afraid!Opponents of legal gambling are notorious within the industry for making up numbers. Robert Goodman, for example, is a discredited "anti" and the founder of the grandly named, though now defunct, "United States Gambling Research Institute." He is infamous for proclaiming, "The American Insurance ... (read more)Gambling and the Law: 'Blackjack and the Law' wins case for casinoIn one of the very first cases heard by the federal court in Las Vegas in 2011, Harrah’s (now renamed Caesars) once again won the right to kick out card-counters. Roger L. Hunt, Chief U.S. District Judge for Nevada, based his decision, in part, on a book I co-authored in 1998, BLACKJACK AND THE ... (read more)I. Nelson Rose |
I. Nelson Rose |
