![]() Newsletter Signup
Stay informed with the
NEW Casino City Times newsletter! Recent Articles
Best of Donald Catlin
|
Gaming Guru
Laying the Odds - Again1 July 2012
I recently received the following e-mail from one of my readers named Dave Beck.
Well, Dave, your question is a bit cryptic but I think I know what you're driving at and I'll address it shortly. First, a few general remarks about your e-mail. Your figures of 22% and 11% are only approximations. When you say that your average outlay on the Pass Line and Placing the 6 & 8 is $40, I'm not sure what you mean. For the benefit of other readers, however, I should point out that place bets on the 6 or 8 must be made in multiples of six units. I think that before you read this you should go into the archives on this site and read my November 2003 article entitled Laying the Odds; it will make reading this article much easier. Now let me rephrase your question into what I think you meant. Many players feel that once you are on a number with a Don't Pass bet you have a better than even chance of winning, so why lay odds? Does laying the odds make up for the lousy chance of winning on the Come Out? Yes, it does and here are the details. Your e-mail infers that you are playing at a casino that allows the odds wager to be three times that of the line wager. If the line bet is an even number then the odds wager will be in multiples of six, which is necessary to get integer payouts. Before I begin let me mention that in the following table I state that the line bet for the twelve is zero. This is because, like my friend and colleague Stewart Ethier, I am firmly in the camp that feels that a tie should not be treated as a resolution of a bet. Doing so can lead to bizarre results. (See my article Mensa Mystery in the archives.) By inserting a zero for the twelve this treats the twelve as a non event. Suppose now that we roll the dice 1980 times with a $10 wager on the Don't Pass and $30 on odds when possible. We then have the following table.
The total amount at risk is the sum of 19,250 and 39,600, which is 58,850. Dividing this into 270 we get the house advantage at approximately 0.4588%. Had we put all of the $40 on the Don't Pass, our total loss would have been 1080 and our total at risk would have been 77,700. Dividing 77,700 into 1080 we have an approximate house edge of 1.39%. Dave, I hope this answers your question. See you next month. Don Catlin can be reached at 711cat@comcast.net This article is provided by the Frank Scoblete Network. Melissa A. Kaplan is the network's managing editor. If you would like to use this article on your website, please contact Casino City Press, the exclusive web syndication outlet for the Frank Scoblete Network. To contact Frank, please e-mail him at fscobe@optonline.net. Recent Articles
Best of Donald Catlin
Donald Catlin |
Donald Catlin |