Newsletter Signup
Stay informed with the
NEW Casino City Times newsletter! Recent Articles
Best of Alan Krigman
|
Gaming Guru
Why Casino Bosses Don't Want You to Quit When You're Ahead26 May 1997
Why so? Because you obviously win if you quit when you're ahead. Being ahead is winning. Winning is being ahead. You surely don't win if you quit when you're behind. Except by declaring a moral victory and moving on, but that's another issue. A tautology poses a dilemma. You can't argue with its truth. But you can't learn anything from it, either. This doesn't imply that the admonition to quit when you're ahead isn't sensible advice. Au contraire, on the contrary. Certain solid citizens lose touch with reality at the casino. They overlook the significance of being ahead by some number of bets in a particular game. What a dollar is worth when it's time to pay the phone bill. What odds have been beaten to achieve the gain. So they don't quit with reasonable earnings. They remember when staying turned paltry profits into big bucks. They forget when the spoils of victory drained down the sewer of defeat. Say you get ahead and quit. Informed casino managers don't sweat your walking away winning a big multiple of their theoretical hold on your action. They'll recover as much from the aggregate of gamblers leaving with correspondingly less than the mathematically-expected values. The bigwigs only brood when you're not betting at all; then, they're not collecting the small but sure commission on your action - the source of their profits. Maybe you want to believe that quitting when you're ahead transcends tautology. That discipline is a way to overcome the laws of probability governing the entire known universe - including class-M planets, supernovas, galaxies, and slot machines. Then picture a pair of players patronizing a casino together, each with $500. Mickey and Minnie make identical bets, simultaneously, at the same craps table. During the session, they undergo the ups and downs characteristic of craps. Smart Minnie always quits when she's ahead. But she also likes to play. So she quits mentally whenever she has a profit, writes down the sum, then immediately starts afresh. In due course, she logs nine separate games. She won the first eight, securing cerebral profits of $1,000. But, she got into a hole at the outset of the ninth game and never emerged. The cold streak that gobbled up Mickey's $500 took Minnie for $1,500 - $500 from home plus $1,000 she mentally amassed in the first eight games. Mickey played one game, losing $500. People not privy to Minnie's approach might presume she did likewise. But Minnie knew she had an eight-game winning streak then got hammered for $1,500. Wow! Talk about coincidence. Stupid Mickey and smart Minnie both ended up the same. It proves the prudence of the proverb penned by the celebrated scrivener of seventh-sonnets, Sumner A Ingmark: Recent Articles
Best of Alan Krigman
Alan Krigman |
Alan Krigman |