![]() Newsletter Signup
Stay informed with the
NEW Casino City Times newsletter! Recent Articles
Best of Alan Krigman
|
Gaming Guru
Variable Payoffs Add a Twist to Table Play3 August 1998
New and modified table games are now appearing which pay varying amounts, including high multiples of the initial bet, depending on the result of a round. Caribbean Stud offers an example. The "Ante" returns 1-to-1; however, money in the "Bet Box" pays from 1-to-1 for scoring on a pair or less, up to 100-to-1 for a royal. Another illustration involves Let It Ride. Winners may get from 1-to-1 for a pair of 10s or better, up to 1000-to-1 for a royal. Jackpot-class returns are one reason some solid citizens savor result-dependent payoffs. The best you can do with a longshot at craps is 30-to-1 on two or 12; $10 gets $300 - nice, but it's hardly gonna enhance your lifestyle. In contrast, starting with three $10 bets at Let It Ride, a single round can yield $30,000. A reasonable chance at collecting something, combined with the potential for big bucks, kindle the hopes and calm the fears of gamblers galore. Players muse over bets sized to modest bankrolls that can put them at the portals of plenty. And they stoically stomach cold streaks, figuring that one win can save the day. Table games featuring variable payoffs may suit your wants and needs. But similar effects, with even more diversity, are possible using appropriate strategies in traditional games. Or, maybe the casino has an upper limit of $1,000 on inside bets at roulette. So your system is to pocket $11,960 after the second win, and bet $1,000 the third time. Now, in three rounds, you have one chance out of 1,407 to convert $10 into $11,960 and one in 50,653 to walk with $361,960. Additional opportunities abound. For instance, bet $10 on a four-number corner - paying 8-to-1 with odds of 8.25-to-1 of losing; this has one chance in 7,321 of growing to $65,610 by parlaying four successive wins. Alternately, make multiple bets at various payoff levels to create almost any conceivable variable payoff schedule. Which approach is best? It's a matter of personal passion. You may want a potent prospect of a passable day's pay. You may prefer to pare the probability of a modest take for a hint at a heavy haul. Maybe you'd rather devise your own strategy than play a game where it's all essentially inherent in the rules. Your choice may be along many other lines as well. For some, a major part of the fascination is in tailoring the attributes of the games to their own tastes. As Sumner A Ingmark, whose poems prove his penchant for personal proclivity, pointedly penned:
Recent Articles
Best of Alan Krigman
Alan Krigman |
Alan Krigman |