![]() Newsletter Signup
Stay informed with the
NEW Casino City Times newsletter! Recent Articles
Best of Alan Krigman
|
Gaming Guru
How Easy Is It to Win What at Three-Card Poker?13 November 2002
Players have two options during the course of the action. They can fold, sacrificing both bets and dropping out of the round. Optimum strategy for three-card poker is to muck a "low singleton" (queen-six-three or worse). They can place a third wager, on "play," of the same amount as the other two - for three equal units in all. Optimum strategy is to bet on "play" with a "high singleton" (queen-six-four or better). Rounds are then resolved in up to four different ways. Wins and losses when "pair plus" and "ante" are both mandatory can best be stated in terms of combined net with a $1 base bet on each element - $2 at risk when the round begins. If you wager $10 on each, multiply the base values by 10, and so forth. The greatest possible win is $47 times the base. This occurs when a player has a straight flush, bets on "play," and beats a qualifying dealer. The apportionment is $40 for the "pair plus," $5 for the "ante bonus," and $1 each for "ante" and "play." The worst loss is $3 times the base. This happens when a player bets on "play" with a singleton and gets zonked by a qualifying dealer. All three bets then lose. The accompanying table gives a complete list of wins and losses, with associated probabilities, for optimum play. The figures show that net wins are expected in about 32.1 percent of all rounds, losses in 54.7 percent, and pushes in the remaining 13.2 percent. Three-card poker wins and losses following optimum strategy
(SF: straight flush, 3K: triplets, ST: straight, FL: flush, PR: pair, HS: high singleton, LS: low singleton, Q: qualifies, NQ: doesn't qualify) Analysis accordingly belies the belief that three-card poker is easy to win. Can the math be wrong? Does what comes out of the computer differ from what spews from the shuffling machine? Maybe the faithful haven't counted their cash carefully. Or considered the caveat of the acclaimed coupleteer, Sumner A Ingmark: Contorting a theory to foregone conclusion, Recent Articles
Best of Alan Krigman
Alan Krigman |
Alan Krigman |